Harvey44
New member
Looks like we've got a little time to kill. :lol: So I thought I would try a poll.
The issue is out there. Why expand terrain when snowmaking is limited?
I totally get that. But after this weekend I'm conflicted. Burnt Ridge was incredible.
Obviously the answer is dependent on the weather and snowfall. If it absolutely DUMPS all winter, sure give me Burnt Ridge. If there is no snow at all, then snowmaking is king. So assume an average snowfall of 150 inches with 90 inches falling here and there, and two epic 30 inch dumps.
A vote for Burnt Ridge is a vote for Echo, Sagamore, The Cirque Glades and the High Speed Quad. Let's say a vote for snowmaking would increase capacity by 30%.
And let's also say, you're not really choosing BETWEEN the two projects. You can afford one project now, and one in five years.
What say you?
The issue is out there. Why expand terrain when snowmaking is limited?
I totally get that. But after this weekend I'm conflicted. Burnt Ridge was incredible.
Obviously the answer is dependent on the weather and snowfall. If it absolutely DUMPS all winter, sure give me Burnt Ridge. If there is no snow at all, then snowmaking is king. So assume an average snowfall of 150 inches with 90 inches falling here and there, and two epic 30 inch dumps.
A vote for Burnt Ridge is a vote for Echo, Sagamore, The Cirque Glades and the High Speed Quad. Let's say a vote for snowmaking would increase capacity by 30%.
And let's also say, you're not really choosing BETWEEN the two projects. You can afford one project now, and one in five years.
What say you?